Why a franchisor should conduct anti-bribery & corruption due diligence on franchisees
When supplying an independent owner with the right to use an established business, a trade name, trademark, proprietary business knowledge and business system, it is essential for a franchisor to conduct a comprehensive background due diligence on that proposed owner.
South Africa has
In this Court of Appeal Judgement in the State of California, the Californian appeal court dealt authoratively with the question of whether a commercial property insurance policy provides coverage for a business’s lost income due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
The court pointed out that while at that time no California appellate court had addressed the
This blog was co-authored by: Rethabile Shabalala, Associate Designate
Ksenia Kholina brought a successful application here, to oblige the Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA) to set a date for an examination to enable her to practise as a dentist. Ksenia was born in Russia but, with her family, relocated to South Africa
In November 2021 the Financial Services Tribunal emphasised that “time and again it has been pronounced that when there is a material dispute of fact, there should be a hearing of oral evidence”.
It is only once the material disputes of fact are addressed that one can conduct an enquiry into the negligence, causation
This blog was co-authored by: Victoria Pillay, Associate
The President has proclaimed that, from 1 December 2021, certain sections of the Cybercrimes Act, 2020 will come into full force. The Cybercrimes Act aims to:
This recent Cape High court judgment contains some useful guidance for insurers in adjusting covid-19 business interruption claims involving recovery or remission of rental.
The court confirmed that as a matter of general principle:
This blog was co-authored by: Bwanika Lwanga, Candidate Attorney
Recently the Supreme Court of Appeal in Rautini v Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (Case no.
853/2020) [2021] ZASCA 158 (8 November 2021) reaffirmed the general rule regarding the drawing of inferences. A court may only draw inferences that are consistent with all the proven