February 2024

Under a “claims-made” liability insurance policy, whether a communication to the insured constitutes a “claim” or a “claim for damages” determines whether the policy is applicable to the claim. The Delaware Supreme Court held that an unclear and amorphous letter from an attorney did not constitute a “claim for damages” required by the policy.

A

During arbitration between a franchisor and franchisee, an interim interdict may be employed to enable the parties to continue to conduct their business arrangements until the dispute is settled. However, in certain circumstances the operation of the interdict may be suspended pending an appeal.

The January 2024 high court judgment in Cash Crusaders Franchising (Pty)

Section 14(1) of the 1969 Prescription Act states that the running of extinctive prescription is interrupted by the debtor’s express or tacit acknowledgement of liability. The question that arose for consideration in Viljoen v Centlec (SOC) Ltd and others 2024 JDT 0217 (FB) (https://app.jutastatevolve.co.za/preview/1___y2024JDRn0217) is whether such interruption can occur after the prescription

The Pretoria High Court recently dismissed a pharmaceutical company’s application to review the Department of Health’s (DOH) decision to classify medicines for the purposes of assessing tender bids.    

The DOH awarded a tender to supply surfactants to treat Respiratory Distress Syndrome at public hospitals.  The tender bid invitation was based on two therapeutic classes

Hollard Insurance Company Ltd and Others v Insure Group Management Ltd (in liquidation) and Others (21/43014) [2023] ZAGPJHC 371 (25 April 2023)

A number of insurers issued summons against an intermediary (the first defendant), its auditor (the second defendant) and its compliance officer (the third defendant) in relation to premiums collected by the intermediary and

The National Consumer Commission (NCC) has recently urged the public to return various brands of peanut butters for a refund. The manufacturer of the peanut butters had informed the NCC that the affected products contain higher than the legally accepted levels of Aflatoxin.

The recall of most consumer products is regulated by the Consumer Protection