In this High Court judgment, the respondent underwriting manager (CIMA), had a binder agreement with the applicant insurer. The binder agreement set out the terms of the mandate given to the UMA, to enter into and administer policies. The UMA was obliged to transact insurance business only within South Africa. The insurer is licensed for

A May 2025 judgment in the UK high court provides a useful examination of the developments in UK law of vicarious liability for the acts of employees and independent contractors. Vicarious liability is liability imputed to one person for the actions of another over whom they have some control. The developments are similar to those

In November 2025, a New South Wales Court of Appeals found that, because the insured “buildings” associated with a petrol station included storage tanks and other “structural improvements” pertaining to the buildings, the underground pipes which connected the petrol storage tanks to the bowsers were part of the insured buildings. Damage to the pipes was

In a case involving shipping insurance, the English Court of Appeal made some interesting remarks regarding the role played by the sole nominee director of a special purpose company. If the director exercises no independent judgment, makes no decisions, and is contractually obliged to act on the instructions of the decision-maker operating the underlying business

In October 2025, a Connecticut Federal Court ruled that the insurer did not owe coverage for a property owner’s claim over a burst water pipe that resulted in a sudden settling of a commercial building making it unsafe for tenants. The court found that the policy’s earth movement and settling exclusion applied. According to the