Patrick Bracher (ZA)

Subscribe to all posts by Patrick Bracher (ZA)

Employees of municipality and government proportionately liable for breach of finance management laws

By Patrick Bracher (ZA) on June 6, 2019 Posted in General

Where a former managing director of a municipal entity was sued by that entity for alleged breach of the Municipal Finance Management Act 2003 (MFMA) it was held that she was entitled to join 19 other municipal officials on the ground that they were allegedly joint wrongdoers and equally liable to the municipality if she … Continue reading

Importing a tacit term into a contract

By Patrick Bracher (ZA) on May 28, 2019 Posted in Drafting tips

Where a non-variation clause and a whole agreement clause were included in a comprehensive contract dealing in detail with the subject matter between the parties, the court refused to import a tacit term into the contract. A tacit term is an unexpressed provision in the contract which derives from the common intention of the parties … Continue reading

Take implementation, good faith and disclosure clauses seriously

By Patrick Bracher (ZA) on May 28, 2019 Posted in Drafting tips, General

Where one of the parties to a contract had secretly entered into agreements with third parties to gain an unfair advantage for itself, the court held that it was in breach of the good faith and non-disclosure provisions and liable for damages. The implementation clause required the parties ‘to do all such things, perform all … Continue reading

Suspensive condition of tender not met – no valid contract

By Patrick Bracher (ZA) on May 15, 2019 Posted in General

A builder submitted a tender to the Development Bank of Southern Africa (DBSA) for construction of a school. The tender was ‘conditionally accepted’ and further documents had to be submitted by a deadline date after which the construction contract would be signed. The documents were not submitted in time nor was the construction contract signed. … Continue reading

What’s on the horizon for the insurance industry in 2019?

By Natasha Naidoo and Patrick Bracher (ZA) on May 7, 2019 Posted in Insurance

Our lawyers across ten jurisdictions have created a guide detailing the top legal concerns for insurers from various regions. Some developments are concerns only in a specific market while other topics appear to be common across several jurisdictions. Increasing focus on personal accountability, greater oversight of distribution chains and the protection of customer interests and … Continue reading

Concourt will only decide on non-constitutional law points if in the interests of justice

By Patrick Bracher (ZA) on May 2, 2019 Posted in General

Where an appeal does not raise any constitutional issue, the South African Constitutional Court will only consider a law point on appeal if the interests of justice require it to do so no matter how interesting, arguable or important the point is. The applicant in Tiekiedraai Eiendomme (Pty) Ltd v Shell South Africa Marketing (Pty) … Continue reading

Difference between advice and information provided by a professional (for example a broker) – English law

By Patrick Bracher (ZA) on April 23, 2019 Posted in Insurance

English law relating to professional negligence draws an interesting distinction between whether the professional person is giving information or giving advice. This is not specifically part of South African law but it is relevant when considering liability, for instance, of brokers under the FAIS Act. The difference is between providing information for the purpose of … Continue reading

Principles of contract for the benefit of a third party (stipulatio alteri)

By Patrick Bracher (ZA) on April 16, 2019 Posted in Drafting tips

A recent academic article by Dr Rika van Zyl argues persuasively that, where there is a contract for the benefit of a third party, the third party accepts the benefit of the contract between the other two parties and not to become a party to the contract. In drafting such contracts you must make sure the … Continue reading

Burden of proof in actions against ship owner for loss of cargo and the principles of bailment (UK)

By Patrick Bracher (ZA) on April 16, 2019 Posted in General

England’s highest court finally, after over four centuries of reported decisions on the issue, definitively held that the burden of proof lies on the carrier where cargo owners sue a ship owner for loss or damage to cargo. If the carrier could and should have taken precautions which would have prevented some inherent characteristic of … Continue reading

Use of a vehicle includes a passenger opening a car door

By Patrick Bracher (ZA) on April 8, 2019 Posted in Insurance

Extraordinarily, a case involving a passenger opening a car door and scratching a neighbouring vehicle in a supermarket carpark led to a decision before the Court of Justice of the European Union. Europe’s highest court found that this is ‘use of vehicles’ for the purposes of motor vehicle insurance. The event happened in Latvia where … Continue reading

Relief denied for director who put personal interests first (US)

By Patrick Bracher (ZA) on April 8, 2019 Posted in General

Under the business judgment rule, a director or officer may be excused from conduct which has adverse circumstances for the company if their judgment, albeit poor judgment, was exercised in good faith and in the interests of the company. In an action in Delaware, USA, the CEO was denied this assistance by the court because, … Continue reading

Repudiation of a contract

By Patrick Bracher (ZA) on April 4, 2019 Posted in General

Where the purchase price of imported sugar included the import duty and the purchase price had to be reduced if the duty was reduced, the persistent claim by the seller for the unreduced amount was a repudiation and led to the lawful cancellation of the sugar contract. Payment of the sugar contract was to be … Continue reading

Contractual claim not covered under liability policy (US)

By Patrick Bracher (ZA) on April 4, 2019 Posted in Insurance

Where the purchaser of an oil refinery sued the seller for breach of contract for $25 million damages resulting from a fire caused by various acts and omissions of the seller prior to the sale, the claim was not covered under the seller’s commercial general liability policy. The claim was not based on property damage but … Continue reading

Acceptance of settlement offer must be unconditional

By Patrick Bracher (ZA) on April 3, 2019 Posted in General

The Supreme Court of Appeal has reaffirmed the principle that where a party alleges that a compromise (settlement) has been effected in an exchange of correspondence it must be proved that the offer of compromise was accepted. The acceptance must be absolute, unconditional and identical with the offer. Otherwise there is no consensus and no … Continue reading

Interpretation of contracts: Wording, context & purpose

By Patrick Bracher (ZA) on April 3, 2019 Posted in Drafting tips

The Supreme Court of Appeal has yet again reaffirmed the principles dealing with the interpretation of contracts. Interpretation of contracts is a unitary exercise which starts with the text to be interpreted and considers it within the contract as a whole, and in context. It requires consideration of text, context and purpose of the contract. … Continue reading

Interpretation of contracts – Don’t relegate the written text

By Patrick Bracher (ZA) on March 26, 2019 Posted in Drafting tips

The Supreme Court of Appeal has decried the growing tendency to lead evidence about what experts think a contract means and about the subjective intention of the parties and details of their negotiation. The written text must not be relegated, but must be considered having regard to the context in which the agreement was entered … Continue reading

Principles of unlawful use of confidential information and trade secrets

By Patrick Bracher (ZA) on March 26, 2019 Posted in General

The Supreme Court of Appeal restated the principles on liability for unlawful competition by the use of the trade secrets of a competitor. Every person is entitled to freely carry on their trade or business in competition with rivals but the competition must remain within lawful bounds. If it involves a wrongful interference with another’s … Continue reading

Insurers’ role in losses caused by malfunctioning technology

By Patrick Bracher (ZA) on March 25, 2019 Posted in Insurance

One of the major issues facing the law in an age of autonomous technology is the question of who is liable for damage caused by a machine or artificial intelligence either by physical injury or the failure of a contract. Insurers will have a major role to play. If a machine such as a driverless … Continue reading

Fraud as a defence to payment under a guarantee

By Patrick Bracher (ZA) on March 25, 2019 Posted in Insurance

The guarantor in Raubex Construction (Pty) Ltd v Bryte Insurance Company alleged that payment under a guarantee was not due because of fraud on the part of the beneficiary. A mere error, misunderstanding or oversight, however unreasonable, does not amount to fraud and is insufficient to show that the contentions of the beneficiary are deliberately … Continue reading

Liability of auditor for incorrect accounting treatment advice (UK)

By Patrick Bracher (ZA) on March 21, 2019 Posted in General

The English Court of Appeal found that the plaintiff building society had not proved damages against its auditors who gave them incorrect information about how to treat long-term interest rate swaps on its balance sheet under the IFRS requirements. The swaps were not included on the balance sheet from 2005 till 2013, when they were … Continue reading

Business rescue application does not terminate provisional liquidation

By Patrick Bracher (ZA) on March 13, 2019 Posted in General

An application for business rescue does not terminate the office of provisional liquidators nor does it result in the assets and management of the company in liquidation re-vesting in the directors of the company. Where a company had been liquidated, an application was made for business rescue in GCC Engineering v Lawrence Maroos. Although section 131(6) … Continue reading

Interpretation of statutes must be consistent with the Constitution

By Patrick Bracher (ZA) on March 13, 2019 Posted in General

The Constitutional Court has reminded us in the context of mineral rights that a statutory provision must be interpreted in accordance with the spirit, purport and objects of the Bill of Rights (s 39(2)) and consistently with the Constitution and consistently with international law (s 233), and the courts must apply customary law when that law is … Continue reading