This Delaware District Court judgment considered the insured’s claim under the insurer’s Not-For-Profit Entity and Directors, Officers Liability Insurance Policy (“the Policy”). 

The Policy the parties explicitly excluded any claim “alleging, arising out of, based upon or attributable to any actual or alleged contractual liability of [SAEDF] under any express contract or agreement.”

The

This judgment dealt with an application based upon a deed of suretyship and indemnity executed by the respondents in favour of the insured.  The deed of surety and indemnity had its genesis in a guarantee issued by the insurer to an airline in favour of Airports Company South Africa SOC Limited, the beneficiary. 

The insurer

This blog was co-authored with Yuveshen Naidoo, Candidate Attorney.

The primary issues in this judgment are:

  1. The eviction of the lessee from its premises for misrepresentation of their intention to use the premises as a cannabis club; and
  2. Whether that was a breach of the lease which was for use as a restaurant.

The

This blog was co-authored with Yuveshen Naidoo, Candidate Attorney

This case is a poignant example of the challenges faced by patients and their families when medical care falls short.

The claimant brought a claim of medical negligence on behalf of her child. The primary issues revolved around allegations of negligence by the medical staff at

The Medicines and Related Substances Act, 1965 requires the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) to monitor the use of medicines in South Africa. SAHPRA is responsible for overseeing adverse drug reaction reporting in South Africa.

Adverse drug reactions (including interactions with other medicines) caused by prescribed medicines, over the counter medicines, or by

In this Court of Appeal judgment of 6 September 2024 in London International Exhibition Centre PLC v Allianz Insurance PLC and Others the court considered what constituted the insured peril occurring “at the premises” of the insured.

The relevant policies contained “at the premises” infectious disease extension wordings.

It had been agreed or

A US court found that cover for loss caused by physical harm, bodily injury or assault between “family members” included assault by the ex-husband because the divorced couple shared the custody of their child with the parenting plan that called for joint decision-making.

The divorce order required the husband to sell their property or refinance

This blog was co-authored with Yuveshen Naidoo, Candidate Attorney.

This case is a poignant example of the challenges faced by patients and their families when medical care falls short.

The claimant brought a claim of medical negligence on behalf of her child. The primary issues revolved around allegations of negligence by the medical staff