An agreement of compromise is the settlement of disputed obligations by agreement.

A compromise exists where parties agree to settle previously disputed or uncertain obligations. Like any other agreement, a compromise is based on the contractual rules of offer and acceptance, with each party conceding something, either by diminishing their alleged claim or by conceding

This blog is co-authored by Ila Alberts, a candidate attorney.

A January 2026 judgment of the Labour Appeal Court highlights the effect of vague drafting within a settlement agreement.

An employee’s alleged unfair dismissal dispute was settled on the basis that “the [employer] agrees to assist with the completion of the forms as required

1. A key change proposed by Labour Law Amendment Bill, 2025 is the introduction of section 77B into the Basic Condition of Employment Act, 75 of 1997 (BCEA).  The proposed change is of particular importance to employers as it seeks to tackle a long-standing challenge concerning unpaid pension and provident fund contributions

According to a February 2026 New York Supreme Court judgment, the insurer was entitled to avoid the policy because of a misrepresentation that the premises were occupied as the insured’s primary residence whereas, since inception of the policy which had been renewed since 2017, the premises were always occupied by two separate tenants.

Under New

This blog is co-authored by, Raaiqhah Akoo, candidate attorney.

In February 2026, the high court confirmed that allegations of racism and unethical conduct published on social media and in a letter to third parties cannot be justified as being in the public interest where there is no admissible evidence establishing their truth. In those circumstances

In January 2026 the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed a joint homeowners’ appeal and held that a standard exclusion of increased costs due to operation of any law remained fully operative despite a “Guaranteed Rebuilding Cost Coverage” (GRC) endorsement to the policy. The court found the policy wording unambiguous and determined that the GCR endorsement

The High Court handed down a judgment in December 2025 which affirms that bidders for public tenders must comply strictly with the requirements set out in the tender documents, including provisions that may be construed as mere formalities.  

The matter arose from a tender for traffic management services issued by a municipality. The tender documents

In February 2026, the Constitutional Court dismissed an aggrieved bidder’s challenge against a decision of the Government Employees Medical Scheme (GEMS) to award a tender for courier services, ruling that the commercial decisions of a medical scheme, including those related to procurement, are generally not susceptible to judicial review. The court also decided that a