Despite there being no explicit agreement on the amount of an intermediary’s commission, the client’s consent to payment of the commission may arise from the circumstances rather than an express agreement.
A recent English case (on solicitors’ fees but pertinent here) points out that informed consent to pay commission may arise when the client knows
English law relating to professional negligence draws an interesting distinction between whether the professional person is giving information or giving advice. This is not specifically part of South African law but it is relevant when considering liability, for instance, of brokers under the FAIS Act. The difference is between providing information for the purpose of
The Retail Distribution Review has reminded us that in 2010 the appeal court in Maree v Chris Booysen t/a NVM Beleggings & Versekeringsadviseurs found that the long-term intermediary was not entitled to an advice fee. Earnings were restricted to a fee for services as intermediary under the Long-term Insurance Act. The matter went through three
An intermediary for the purposes of the FAIS Act and the Short-term Insurance Act is someone who acts as a go-between interposed between a client and product supplier whose acts directly result in a financial transaction, for instance a policy, being entered into. That means that someone supplying leads that may indirectly result in a