In an August 2024 Australian Federal Court judgment previously discussed here [“Hemiplegia” – Personal Accident and Sickness Policy (Australia) | Financial Institutions Legal Snapshot], the court found that the insured did not suffer from hemiplegia, and accordingly did not qualify for any benefits under the policy. The court nevertheless considered whether the insured’s
LegalInsights
“Hemiplegia” – Personal Accident and Sickness Policy (Australia)
By Donald Dinnie on
The primary issue the court had to determine in an August 2024 Australian Federal Court judgment was whether the insured’s “Bodily Injury” was “permanent hemiplegia” as defined by the insured’s Professional Sports Personal Accident and Sickness Insurance Policy.
The insured, a former professional football player had suffered a significant injury while…
Double insurance in indemnity insurance contracts: some practical considerations
By Ina Iyer on
- Insurance by, or on behalf of, the same insured;
- Over the same interest in respect of the same risk object;
- Under different, concurrent and not layered, insurance contracts;
- With two or