Tag archives: Medical negligence

Damages not recoverable for raising IVF conceived child born without father’s informed consent

By Natasha Naidoo on January 24, 2019 Posted in General

The England Appeal Court has held that a father’s claim against a clinic for breach of contract for damages suffered as a result of raising his child who was born by IVF to his estranged wife without his consent were not recoverable due to legal policy. The child was conceived via IVF using the gametes … Continue reading

Hospital receptionists owe duty to inform patients accurately regarding available medical assistance

By Sandra Sithole (ZA) on November 12, 2018 Posted in General

A judgment of the English Court of Appeal which we called ‘bizarre’ and ‘peculiar’ has been predictably overturned by the UK Supreme Court. The Supreme Court found that the hospital run by the NHS Trust is liable to a patient with a head injury who had been given misinformation by the hospital receptionist that he … Continue reading

Covering doctors have an immediate legal duty of care to patients

By Deniro Pillay (ZA) on October 2, 2018 Posted in General

A doctor who covers for a colleague has an immediate legal duty to care for his colleague’s patients whilst on call. This was recently confirmed by the Supreme Court of Appeal in a case where a doctor (gynaecologist/obstetrician) agreed to cover for a colleague. The doctor positively responded to a telephone call from a midwife … Continue reading

General damages and contingency deductions in medical negligence cases

By Yash Naidoo on March 23, 2018 Posted in General

When a patient’s brain injuries diminishes their awareness and full appreciation of their pain and suffering, an award for general damages is appropriate if the patient experiences intermittent periods of heightened awareness. When determining the amount to be awarded for general damages, our courts prefer a flexible approach. The award should be determined by the … Continue reading

The massive cost of medical negligence cases is an international problem

By Sandra Sithole (ZA) on December 11, 2017 Posted in Insurance

It is not only in South Africa that the cost of medical negligence lawsuits is draining the health service. There are calls in Britain for reform to help protect the National Health Service from pay-outs which hit GBP1.4 billion in the fiscal year ending March 2016 alone. The UK Centre for Policy Studies says that the … Continue reading

Periodic compensation of future medical expenses

By Sandra Sithole (ZA) and Patrick Bracher (ZA) on November 6, 2017 Posted in General

In a landmark judgment, the Constitutional Court has left the door open for the development of the common law to have future damages in personal injury claims paid periodically and by way of services. The Constitutional Court was faced with the question whether massive future medical expenses based on speculation can be paid by way … Continue reading

Law Commission report on medico-legal claims for comment by 30 September 2017

By Donald Dinnie and Sandra Sithole (ZA) on July 31, 2017 Posted in General

The South African Law Reform Commission has issued a lengthy paper on the investigations into medico-legal claims with proposals for the reform of the law in connection with those claims. The paper discusses the current situation and the legal principles underlying claims for damages for medical negligence, state liability, the basis for payment of compensation … Continue reading

Facebook page costs woman future loss claim (UK)

By Sandra Sithole (ZA) on May 10, 2017 Posted in General

A 37 year old woman from Nottingham has lost a claim for future pain and suffering following failure by a hospital to notify her of a positive result of a sexually transmitted infection with the result that the infection was left untreated for a year. The woman who suffered from a pre-existing somatic symptom disorder … Continue reading

Exclusion for medical services in a medical malpractice claim (US)

By Sandra Sithole (ZA) on April 24, 2017 Posted in Insurance

Over a 150 patients claimed damages against a hospital because of an outbreak of fungal meningitis and related infections which resulted from the patients receiving injections with contaminated substances. The court held that there was no claim under the insurer’s commercial package policy based on personal injury claims because the policies excluded bodily injury ‘due … Continue reading

Loss of the right to rear a child does not give rise to constitutional damages

By Justin Malherbe (ZA) and Rukshana Parker on March 20, 2017 Posted in General

Our law does not recognise a claim for constitutional damages for loss of a parent’s right to rear a child who was stillborn as a result of medical negligence. In Mbhele v MEC Health for the Gauteng Province, an expectant mother was admitted to Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital with signs of foetal distress – an … Continue reading

Failure to assess risk of schizophrenic prison inmate covered by policy

By Sandra Sithole (ZA) on September 26, 2016 Posted in Insurance

In June 2016, the Australian New South Wales Supreme Court held a liability insurer liable to indemnify its insured, a prison detention centre, for a claim arising from the insured’s failure to note that one of its inmates suffered from chronic schizophrenia as a result of which he was not given access to his anti-psychotic … Continue reading

Pain and suffering includes mental anguish from medical negligence

By Sandra Sithole (ZA) on September 21, 2016 Posted in General

In March 2016, the Austrian Supreme Court granted an award for pain and suffering to a patient for mental strain after a piece of broken scissors was left in his body following a surgery despite the fact that the claimant had not suffered any physical pain. The action was brought against the manufacturer of the … Continue reading

Nothing special about “Res ipsa loquitur” (the facts speak for themselves)

By Jay Page on December 1, 2014 Posted in Insurance

The supreme court of appeal has endorsed calls to jettison the term res ipsa loquitor (the thing speaks for itself) completely from our law. The court remarked that res ipsa loquitur is not a legal rule, is misleading and is unnecessary. Res ipsa loquitur has for some time been championed by plaintiff attorneys in medico-legal … Continue reading