This blog was co-authored by Felix Le Roux, Candidate Attorney
On 3 October 2023, the Constitutional Court dismissed an appeal by a joint venture oil company in respect of a review application it had brought against SARS. The Court ruled that a further request for reasons by an applicant, after the administrator has provided the
This blog was co-authored by Candidate Attorney, Felix Le Roux.
In a previous blog, we pointed out that the ambit and limitations of PAJA review proceedings are frequently misconstrued, and that PAJA reviews are limited to the review grounds available and raised by the applicant in terms of PAJA. In a September 2023 judgment
This blog was co-authored by Felix Le Roux, Candidate Attorney.
On 6 July 2023, the Cape Town High Court dismissed an application brought against the South African Reserve Bank (SARB) for the release of funds subject to a blocking order that was issued due to alleged exchange control contraventions from which the applicant gained R60
This blog was co-authored with Felix Le Roux, Candidate Attorney
On 10 March 2023 the Constitutional Court held that the Special Tribunal, established in terms of section 2(1)(b) of the Special Investigating Units and Special Tribunals Act, 1996 (the SIU Act) to adjudicate civil proceedings emanating from an investigation by the Special Investigating Unit (SIU)
This blog was co-authored by: Felix Le Roux, Candidate Attorney
In the June 2022 case of Tsogo Sun Caledon (Pty) Ltd and Others v Western Cape Gambling and Racing Board and Another, involving a decision of a gambling board to impose conditions in respect of gambling licences, the Supreme Court of Appeal said the
The Supreme Court of Appeal has reaffirmed that the making of regulations by a Minister acting in terms of a statute constitutes administrative action within the meaning of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, 2000. This means that such regulations can be challenged if they are outside the powers of the Minister under the enabling
In February the high court confirmed that the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act (PAJA) applies to section 37C decisions on the distribution of death benefits made by the boards of retirement funds under the Pension Funds Act. In Mbatha v Transport Sector Retirement Fund and Salt Employee Benefits the court also confirmed the accepted
In an important judgment, the Constitutional Court emphasises that fundamental rights are primarily meant to protect human beings against the state. All the rights contained in our Bill of Rights are very much fundamental rights, including the right to just administrative action enshrined in section 33.
South Africa’s administrative law benefits natural and juristic private
The Cape High Court decision in April 2017 setting aside the Minister of Energy’s decision determining the requirements for procurement of nuclear generation capacity and tabling of the related Russian intergovernmental agreement (IGA) in parliament usefully reminds us of a few important principles of constitutional and administrative law:
We have been reminded again that regulations that are unreasonable and irrational can be challenged under the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act (PAJA). Regulations are made under empowering provisions in the governing law, have a direct external legal effect on the parties they apply to, and adversely affect the rights of persons in the industry