The failure to comply strictly with formalities and other procedural requirements imposed by a statute does not necessarily lead to invalidity. Even where the formalities required by statute are peremptory it is not every deviation from the literal prescription in the statute that is fatal.

The question remains whether, in spite of the defects, the

From an academic point of view a sale has taken place when the parties agree on the price and on the items sold even if they have not yet paid the price or delivered the item. It also has a wider meaning that requires delivery of the property to the buyer before the sale is

The Interpretation Act 1957 explains when laws commence and what happens when a law is repealed.

Commencement of laws

If a day is not set for the coming into operation of a law, that day will be the day when the law was first published in the Gazette as a law.

If any act provides

The Interpretation Act 1957 applies to the interpretation of all laws, so it is a useful act to know.

The act was last amended to incorporate the 1993 Interim Constitution. While there are some archaic and strange provisions, like the mention of the former colonies and the Royal Letters Patent of His Majesty King William

Decision-making powers granted by law to a government official must serve the particular purpose of the legislation that is the source of the power.

The person making the decision must take into account those things specifically required by the statute, must not consider anything which the statute identifies as irrelevant to the decision, and may

Where the language of a written contract is ambiguous, evidence is admissible to construe its meaning, by reference to its context or the factual circumstances under which the contract was concluded. The apparent purpose to which the contract was directed may also be considered when interpreting it. Evidence may be admitted as to what was

A statute should not be interpreted as having retrospective effect unless there is an express provision to that effect or that the result is unavoidable from the language used.

The plaintiff was born when the age of majority for the purposes of extinctive prescription was 21 years. The age of majority was changed to 18